Marina CCO proposal Debate

Economic Benefits - Costs

Option 2

The resident supports Option 2, acknowledging the potential for profits to be reinvested back into the Marina, which could benefit both the facility and the broader community. However, they express concerns about the lack of democratic oversight and accountability in this model, suggesting the need for safeguards. They also emphasize the importance of transparency and justification in any increased fees for marina berth holders, advocating for clear communication and opportunities for stakeholder feedback on financial decisions.

Table of comments:

Point No

Comment

1438.4

Option 2 with reservations. There would be considerably less democratic 'contact' and accountability, unless safeguards are put in place. Using the profits to feed back into the Marina is good - but profits are not everything. Increased fees for marina berth holders must be something that berth holders can 'see', 'understand' and have feedback on. If there are some projects that require a big financial input, it would be approriate for the Council to add funds, including from general ratepayers. Some of the Marina Master Plan proposals were about Marina changes that were to benefit the whole population of Nelson and visitors, not just Marina users. Surely this should be part of Council funding. I certainly agree with continuing with the Asset-Owning Council-Controlled Trading Organisation, I am not sure about transferring all liabilities.There were many good suggestions in the Master Plan. But all the proposals will need more discussion, detailing and planning. Can the small Controlled Organsation manage all this? It could be difficult.